Correlation or Contagion?
Sally Limantour
The selling continues this morning as the Chinese government this morning has rekindled global slowing concerns. We have taken out last weeks lows and now are focused on China’s promise of increased regulation of banking and real estate as well as the possibility of additional interest rate hikes. We still have our usual suspects lurking in the background – carry trade unwinds, sub-prime home blues, and recession fears. With stocks, commodities and currencies falling across the board a question is circulating across the globe – is this a typical “healthy correction” where contagion kicks in as investors/traders liquidate positions across the board in all asset classes? Or does this have a different premise where the global macro backdrop of different asset classes is so highly correlated that a new paradigm is evolving which will threaten our beloved Goldilocks scenario?
“US demand has come in weaker than expected. Maybe the China story and the sub prime story are linked. The weakness in housing is going to cause real problems in the supply chain to the US consumer and that could be US small caps, or it could be in Asia. The saying these days is that the only thing that goes up when the market goes down is correlation.” --from FT.com article, Feb 28, titled: ‘Correlation rather than contagion’
People are now focused on concerns and until that changes, markets will stay under pressure. Now the hard questions are being asked concerning China and their murky accounting practices, their still stringent capital controls which defacto prevent an exit and the true rights and claims of so called Chinese shareholders (350 out of 500 of the largest listed Chinese stocks are still government owned). In addition questions regarding the private equity market (which is for the most part unregulated and unreported) and its size and risk to the overall banking and financial system are being asked. Not to mention the size of the carry trade unwind and derivative positions. I am not one to get to negative, but as I said last Wednesday we are trying to assess where real liquidity begins and leverage ends. It is a tangled web.
In the short term I expect a short covering rally perhaps early in the week and then further weakness in the equity markets. My shortest term model is getting close to a buy signal and we have the put to call ratio now at a high level. Intraday ranges should continue to be wider than what we became accustomed to and volatility will continue to move higher.
I watched Master and Commander (for the 3rd time) over the weekend and there is a classic scene when the ship is under attack and a small boy is crouching with fear. The Captain pulls him up and says, “stand tall in the quarterdeck,” meaning, be present and responsible. Heading into the week listen carefully to what the market has to say, respect the charts, preserve your capital and trade only with good risk/reward scenarios.

Prior to the hedge fund collapse the market had been on a steady four-year climb. You could throw anything at it and it wouldn’t go down. Mind you, the SPY was still 25% below the 2000 high and it had a long way to go.
In the next week or two, we are going to be looking for longer-term entry points. We are going to distance ourselves from the market and we will keep our powder relatively dry. As the market compresses and the lows are established and tested, I will start layering buy stop orders so that when the market rebounds, our orders will be executed on the way up. I still feel that the earnings are good, interest rates are relatively low, employment is robust and inflation is in check. This is also the third year of a Presidential term and that has historically been very bullish. If I had to pick support levels, I would say SPY 132.50 and then SPY 125. The missing piece of the puzzle is the leverage used by the hedge funds. We don’t know that answer, but the brokerage firms that clear their business do. Come to think of it, those same firms have proprietary trading operations. I’m sure there is a “China Wall” between those divisions and that information is never shared – not. They know the “panic levels” and someone will get hurt. We’ll let the charts be out guide.
Yesterday’s Chicago purchasing manager’s Index for Feb. came in at 48.7 and anything under 50 is not particularly healthy. In addition inventories rose sharply to 54.5 from 41.9 which is bothersome as is the new home sales number in January, which fell 16.6%. With the medium/long term models still on a sell signal from last week and the short term model on a sell from Tuesday morning, my view remains the same as Monday – continued weakness with increased intraday volatility that will make day trading a fun job again. Witness this morning’s sharp break and rally, something nimble traders welcome. Until we get solid closes over 1429.00 in ESH7 and models turn at least neutral, I will stay defensive while taking advantage of intraday extremes.
and on May 15, 2006, after a two-day SPX rapid sell off of 31 pts, VIX only hit +4 sigma.
And for comparison only, here is yesterday's VXN chart (NDX Vol Index) -- notice it only hit +4 Sigma yesterday!!



















































